Can Reebok Basketball Actually Make a Comeback?

After nearly two decades on the sidelines, Reebok says it's ready to get back in the game. But in a basketball sneaker market that’s more crowded—and more cutthroat—than ever, the question is: Can Reebok Basketball actually make a comeback?

The brand once played a major role in shaping basketball culture. In the ‘90s and early 2000s, Reebok had real juice—Allen Iverson’s Question became an icon, and Shaquille O’Neal was larger than life both literally and figuratively. The brand had identity, presence, and product that resonated on and off the court.

Then it disappeared.

After being acquired by adidas in 2006, Reebok’s basketball division essentially went dark. For nearly 20 years, the brand retreated from performance hoops while the market evolved without them. Now, under new ownership and new leadership, which includes Shaq and AI as the president and vice president of basketball, Reebok says it's ready to rebuild—on its own terms.

A Grassroots Strategy—With Real Risks

Reebok’s comeback is rooted in what it’s calling a grassroots approach. The brand knows it can’t outspend Nike or adidas, and it's not trying to. Instead, they’re betting on long-term development: signing younger athletes, growing with them, and letting culture catch up.

The current roster includes Angel Reese, DiJonai Carrington, Matas Buzelis, Dink Pate, Darius Acuff Jr., and Nate Ament. Reese brings real star power and cultural relevance—but beyond her, it’s a lineup built more on potential than proven visibility.

That slower, less flashy route could pay off in time. But in a basketball culture driven by hype, highlights, and heat, it’s also a massive gamble. You don’t build momentum quietly in 2025. You have to fight for attention.

Angel Reese Is the Face—But Can Her Game Sell Shoes?

The centerpiece of Reebok’s new basketball push is Angel Reese. She’s one of the most recognizable names in women’s basketball, with star power that stretches far beyond the court. From college dominance to brand deals to her growing media presence, Reese moves the needle. Her signature sneaker is confirmed to release later this year, making her one of just a few active WNBA players with a true sig.

But the question isn’t about her visibility—it’s about translation. Will that star power actually sell sneakers?

Reese’s game is built on physicality, defense, and paint dominance. She’s not a highlights-per-minute scorer or a logo-range shooter like Caitlin Clark. And in sneaker culture, flash often drives hype. Selling a performance shoe built around a bruising big can be tough—especially when the audience gravitates toward finesse, flair, and viral moments.

That’s not to say Reese’s shoe won’t work. With the right campaign, the right storytelling, and the right product, it could land. But Reebok can’t just assume that name recognition will carry it. They’ll need to create urgency and energy around the launch—or risk wasting one of their best shots at relevance.

The Engine A: A Make-or-Break Sneaker

Beyond Reese’s signature, Reebok recently launched the Engine A—its first true performance basketball sneaker in over a decade.

This isn’t just another release—it’s a proof of concept. Reebok is trying to show it can still make a modern, tech-driven, court-ready basketball shoe. The success of the Engine A is absolutely critical. If the shoe lands with players, if it looks good on-foot, and if it earns real adoption, it could reestablish Reebok as a serious performance brand.

If it doesn’t? It reinforces the perception that Reebok’s basketball days are behind them.

So far, the rollout has been quiet. No major campaigns. Minimal buzz. And in a space where performance needs to be paired with story, that’s a problem.

Budget Talk vs. Reality

Reebok has been transparent about its financial limitations—and the Power Moves Netflix documentary drives the point home. At one point, Reebok floated the idea of signing Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, one of the most stylish and marketable players in the league. He re-signed with Converse, and the implication was obvious: Reebok couldn’t afford to be in that conversation.

Being realistic about your budget is one thing. But this is a business where attention, relevance, and access cost real money. Sneaker culture doesn’t just reward smart strategy—it rewards saturation. Nike, adidas, even New Balance—these brands don’t just have good product, they have presence. Everywhere. All the time.

Reebok says it’s playing the long game, building organically, betting on upside. And sure—maybe they can carve out a lane for themselves again. Maybe they can become relevant in pockets of culture, maybe even have a signature moment or two.

But does that mean they’ll actually be competing with the big boys again? Honestly, it’s hard to see it.

If Reebok isn’t willing—or able—to spend at the level that today’s sneaker ecosystem demands, they may have already defined their ceiling. Comeback? Maybe. Contender? That’s a different story.

Nostalgia Is a Trap

Shaq and Iverson are back in leadership roles. The retro releases keep coming. But Reebok can’t rely on its past to fix its future.

Sure, the Question and Shaqnosis still resonate with sneakerheads. But Gen Z didn’t grow up on Iverson. Reebok can’t keep repackaging its legacy and expect new relevance to follow. The brand needs new icons, not just revived ones.

So far, that icon hasn’t arrived.

So… Can Reebok Actually Pull This Off?

Maybe. But the road ahead is steep.

Reebok has a vision. It has a compelling face in Angel Reese. It even has a brand-new performance model in the Engine A. But in a marketplace that moves at hyperspeed and rewards brands that go big, Reebok’s quiet, grassroots approach feels like it’s fighting upstream.

And the pressure isn’t just external—it’s internal, too. In Power Moves, Shaq puts a timeline on it:

“I’m giving myself three years. If we’re not number two in three years, I’m gonna be very upset.”

That’s a bold goal—and maybe an unrealistic one. Reebok isn’t just trying to return. It’s trying to leapfrog brands that have been grinding nonstop for two decades. Legacy can open a door, but it won’t keep you in the room.

If Reebok really wants to be back in the conversation, it’s going to take more than storytelling and symbolism. It’s going to take budget. Boldness. And actual wins.

Sole Retriever

Sole Retriever is the leading source for all things sneakers. Tap in for the latest and greatest news.